Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 19, Issue 2 , Pages 150-154, April 2005

National survey regarding the management of an intraoperatively diagnosed patent foramen ovale during coronary artery bypass graft surgery

  • Mikhail R. Sukernik, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Mikhail R. Sukernik, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, H187, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, PO Box 850, Hershey, PA 17033-0850.
  • ,
  • Sumeet Goswami, MD
  • ,
  • Robert J. Frumento, MS, MPH

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Mehmet C. Oz, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Surgery, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA
  • ,
  • Elliott Bennett-Guerrero, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

Objective: With the increased use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), patent foramen ovale (PFO) has become a common finding during routine coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. This survey was designed to study potential differences in the management of intraoperatively diagnosed PFO.

Design: A written survey.

Setting: US university and community hospitals.

Participants: The authors randomly selected 50% of US cardiac surgeons listed in the Cardiothoracic Surgery Network Database (n = 734).

Interventions: A written survey was mailed to the participants. The survey questions included respondents’ use of TEE during CABG surgery, examination for a PFO with TEE, and management of intraoperatively diagnosed PFO in the CABG surgery.

Measurements and main results: Overall, 64% of individuals (468/734) responded to the survey request. TEE is available in the primary institution of 98.6% of respondents and used to search for a PFO in approximately one third of all CABG surgeries. During planned on-pump CABG surgery, 27.9% of respondents always close an intraoperatively diagnosed PFO, whereas 10.2% of respondents never close an intraoperatively diagnosed PFO. During planned off-pump CABG surgery, 27.6% of surgeons never change their plan, and 11% of respondents always convert the procedure to on-pump CABG to close the PFO. The majority of respondents decide whether to close a PFO based on the size of the PFO, the right atrial pressure, and a history of possible paradoxical embolism.

Conclusions: In the United States, TEE is used extensively during CABG surgery. There is significant variability in how intraoperatively diagnosed PFO is managed during CABG surgery.

Key words:  TEE , patent foramen ovale , PFO , coronary artery bypass grafting , CABG , combined procedures , cardiac surgery , survey

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1053-0770(05)00024-8

doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2005.01.022

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 19, Issue 2 , Pages 150-154, April 2005