Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 26-30, February 2006

Cardiac Output Measurement During Infrarenal Aortic Surgery: Echo-Esophageal Doppler Versus Thermodilution Catheter

  • Aurélie Lafanechère, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Beaujon, Clichy, France
  • ,
  • Pierre Albaladejo, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Beaujon, Clichy, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Pierre Albaladejo, MD, PhD, Service d’Anesthésie-Réanimation SAMU-SMUR 94 du Professeur Jean MARTY, Hôpital Henri Mondor, 51 Avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94000 Créteil, France
  • ,
  • Mathieu Raux, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Beaujon, Clichy, France
  • ,
  • Thomas Geeraerts, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Beaujon, Clichy, France
  • ,
  • Rémi Bocquet, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Beaujon, Clichy, France
  • ,
  • Anne Wernet, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Beaujon, Clichy, France
  • ,
  • Yves Castier, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Vascular and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital Beaujon, Clichy, France
  • ,
  • Jean Marty, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Beaujon, Clichy, France

Objective: Aortic surgery is associated with various hemodynamic and cardiac output modifications. These disorders may be partly caused by blood flow redistribution between supra-aortic and descending aorta regions during clamping and unclamping. A new echo-esophageal Doppler (Hemosonic 100; Arrow, Reading, PA) calculates cardiac output from a simultaneous measurement of blood flow velocity and diameter of the descending aorta. This calculation may be affected by blood redistribution during aortic clamping. The aim of this study was to compare cardiac output measured by echo-esophageal Doppler and by bolus thermodilution catheter during infrarenal aortic surgery.

Design: Prospective, observational study.

Setting: University hospital, single institution.

Participants: Twenty-two adult patients.

Interventions: Infrarenal aortic surgery.

Measurements and Main Results: Cardiac outputs monitored by both devices were highly correlated during the whole surgical procedure (r2 ranging from 0.54 to 0.76). Bland and Altman analysis showed absence of significant bias before and after clamping (ranging from 0.1 ± 0.73 L/min to 0.18 ± 1 L/min, p > 0.05) and a significant bias of 0.5 ± 1.05 L/min (p < 0.05) during aortic clamping. Limits of agreement did not differ significantly during the whole surgical procedure (ranging from −1.36/2.19 to −2.23/2.49). During clamping and unclamping, changes in cardiac output obtained by both methods were positively correlated (r2 = 0.7).

Conclusions: Bias between both methods was clinically acceptable, and limits of agreement were not significantly modified by aortic clamping. However, larger studies including homogenous aortic pathologies are necessary to validate this method during infrarenal aortic surgery.

Key words:  aortic surgery , cardiac output monitoring , esophageal Doppler , thermodilution catheter

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1053-0770(05)00308-3

doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2005.07.029

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 20, Issue 1 , Pages 26-30, February 2006