Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 20, Issue 4 , Pages 484-492, August 2006

Sevoflurane-Remifentanil Versus Propofol-Remifentanil Anesthesia at a Similar Bispectral Level for Off-Pump Coronary Artery Surgery: No Evidence of Reduced Myocardial Ischemia

  • Jean Dominique Law-Koune, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
  • ,
  • Catherine Raynaud, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
  • ,
  • Ngai Liu, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
  • ,
  • Claude Dubois, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
  • ,
  • Mauro Romano, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
  • ,
  • Marc Fischler, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Marc Fischler, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Foch Hospital, 40 rue Worth, 92151 Suresnes, France.

published online 01 February 2006.

Objective: Sevoflurane could decrease myocardial ischemic injury in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery. This study was designed to compare postoperative troponin I (cTnI) concentrations after sevoflurane-remifentanil versus propofol-remifentanil anesthesia.

Design: Prospective, randomized single-blind clinical study.

Setting: University hospital.

Participants: Eighteen patients.

Interventions: General anesthesia was conducted with sevoflurane-remifentanil (n = 9) or propofol-remifentanil (n = 9). Administration of sevoflurane and propofol was adjusted to maintain the bispectral index (BIS) between 40 and 60.

Measurements and Main Results: Groups were comparable regarding the patients’ characteristics. The objective of BIS was maintained in both groups except during the period of coronary artery grafts (p < 0.001) when the BIS number in the propofol group fell below 40 and was significantly lower than in the sevoflurane group. Intraoperative hemodynamic variables were similar between groups. No patient required cardiopulmonary bypass. Need for inotropic and vasoactive support during the first graft was not necessary in the propofol group and occurred in 4 patients in the sevoflurane group (not significant). During the second graft, 2 patients in the propofol group and 3 in the sevoflurane group needed hemodynamic support. Postoperative hemodynamic variables were comparable between groups. Areas under the curve of postoperative increases in cTnI were 27.0 ± 38.6 and 17.4 ± 14.6 ng/mL/hour in the sevoflurane and propofol groups, respectively (not significant).

Conclusion: This study does not support cardioprotective effects of sevoflurane. The particularly short total cumulative duration of ischemia and the relatively low administered end-tidal sevoflurane concentrations may explain this result.

Key words:  off-pump coronary bypass surgery , ischemia , volatile , sevoflurane , intravenous , propofol , monitoring , bispectral index

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1053-0770(05)00317-4

doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2005.08.001

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 20, Issue 4 , Pages 484-492, August 2006