Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 20, Issue 5 , Pages 644-647, October 2006

Paravertebral Ropivacaine, 0.3%, and Bupivacaine, 0.25%, Provide Similar Pain Relief After Thoracotomy

Department of Anesthesiology, “Gregorio Marañón” General Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

published online 05 June 2006.

Objective: This study was designed to determine whether ropivacaine plus fentanyl was as effective as bupivacaine plus fentanyl in a continuous thoracic paravertebral block after posterolateral thoracotomy.

Design: Patients were randomly assigned in a blinded fashion to receive 1 of 2 solutions for paravertebral analgesia.

Setting: Multi-institutional university hospital.

Participants: Sixty patients undergoing elective thoracotomy.

Interventions: A continuous paravertebral infusion of 0.1 mL/kg/h of either 0.3% ropivacaine/fentanyl, 3 μg/mL, or 0.25% bupivacaine/fentanyl, 3 μg/mL, was started on admission to the intensive care unit.

Measurements and Main Results: Pain scores (rest, deep breathing, and coughing), spirometry, subcutaneous opioids, or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug consumption and adverse events were assessed for 48 hours. Both techniques provided adequate pain relief for the first 2 days after posterolateral thoracotomy. There were no differences between groups in pain scores at rest, coughing, or movement. There was an improvement of spirometry values between the first and second day in both groups. There were no differences in the requirements for rescue analgesia and side effects between groups.

Conclusions: It is concluded that both bupivacaine, 0.25%, and ropivacaine, 0.3%, with fentanyl are equally effective for post-thoracotomy pain control when used via continuous paravertebral blockade.

Key words: post-thoracotomy pain, paravertebral block, paravertebral analgesia, analgesic techniques, postoperative care, thoracic surgery

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1053-0770(06)00098-X

doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2006.02.032

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 20, Issue 5 , Pages 644-647, October 2006