Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 21, Issue 5 , Pages 636-643, October 2007

Uncalibrated Arterial Pulse Contour Analysis Versus Continuous Thermodilution Technique: Effects of Alterations in Arterial Waveform

  • Suraphong Lorsomradee, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Chiangmai, Chiangmai, Thailand
  • ,
  • Sratwadee Lorsomradee, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Chiangmai, Chiangmai, Thailand
  • ,
  • Stefanie Cromheecke, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
  • ,
  • Stefan G. De Hert, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Antwerp, Edegem, Belgium.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Stefan G. De Hert, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospital Antwerp, Wilrijkstraat 10, B-2650 Edegem, Belgium.

published online 10 May 2007.

Objective: To compare an arterial pressure-derived cardiac output (APCO) (Vigileo software version 1.07; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA) and a thermodilution cardiac output (CCO) as methods for measuring cardiac output under different pathologic and experimental conditions that induce changes in arterial waveform morphology.

Design: A prospective study.

Setting: A university hospital, single institutional.

Participants: Fifty-two patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery.

Interventions: Simultaneous APCO and CCO were compared in low-risk patients undergoing elective coronary artery surgery (without valvular disease) (control, n = 20), patients with aortic stenosis (AS, n = 10), aortic insufficiency (AI, n = 10), and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP, n = 12). In the control group, additional data were registered before and after median sternotomy and phenylephrine administration.

Measurements and Main Results: In the control group, Bland-Altman showed a bias of −3% (95% limits of agreement: −59% to +53%) before cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and of −1% (95% limits of agreement: −51% to +50%) after CPB. In the AS group, the bias was −5% (95% limits of agreement: −34% to +24%) before CPB and 1% (95% limits of agreement: −28 to +30%) after CPB. In the AI group bias was +32% (95% limits of agreement: −4% to +68%) before CPB and −2% (95% limits of agreement: −35% to +32%) after CPB. Median sternotomy decreased CCO by 10% ± 10%, whereas it increased APCO by 56% ± 28%. Phenylephrine administration decreased CCO by 11% ± 16%, whereas it increased APCO by 55% ± 34%.

Conclusions: Cardiac output measurement based on uncalibrated pulse contour analysis is able to reflect cardiac output measured with the continuous thermodilution method in patients undergoing uncomplicated coronary artery surgery. However, in situations in which the arterial pressure waveform is changed, agreement between techniques may be altered and data obtained with uncalibrated pulse contour analysis may become less reliable.

Key Words: continuous cardiac output, pulse contour analysis, thermodilution, cardiac surgery, aortic stenosis, aortic insufficiency, intra-aortic balloon pump, phenylephrine, sternotomy

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1053-0770(07)00039-0

doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2007.02.003

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 21, Issue 5 , Pages 636-643, October 2007