Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 22, Issue 3 , Pages 388-393 , June 2008

The Accuracy of the Vigileo/FloTrac Continuous Cardiac Output Monitor

  • Andreas Zimmermann, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Andreas Zimmermann, MD, Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Müllner Hauptstrasse 48, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria.
  • ,
  • Christine Kufner, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
  • ,
  • Stephan Hofbauer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
  • ,
  • Joachim Steinwendner, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
  • ,
  • Wolfgang Hitzl, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Research Office, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
  • ,
  • Gerhard Fritsch, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
  • ,
  • Roland Schistek, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiac Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
  • ,
  • Michael Kirnbauer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
  • ,
  • Gernot Pauser, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria

References 

  1. Reutershan J, Ressel M, Wagner T, et al. Non-invasive determination of effective pulmonary blood flow: Evaluation of a simplified rebreathing method. J Med Eng Technol. 2003;27:194–199
  2. Felbinger TW, Reuter DA, Eltzschig HK, et al. Comparison of pulmonary arterial thermodilution and arterial pulse contour analysis: Evaluation of a new algorithm. J Clin Anesth. 2002;14:296–301
  3. Barry BN, Mallick A, Bodenham AR, et al. Lack of agreement between bioimpedance and continuous thermodilution measurement of cardiac output in intensive care unit patients. Crit Care. 1997;1:71–74
  4. Moxon D, Pinder M, van Heerden PV, Parsons RW. Clinical evaluation of the HemoSonic monitor in cardiac surgical patients in the ICU. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2003;31:408–411
  5. Iijima T. Another alternative for cardiac output measurement–pulse dye-densitometry. Crit Care Med. 1999;27:1693–1694
  6. Mielck F, Buhre W, Hanekop G, et al. Comparison of continuous cardiac output measurements in patients after cardiac surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003;17:211–216
  7. van Heerden PV, Baker S, Lim SI, et al. Clinical evaluation of the noninvasive cardiac output (NICO) monitor in the intensive care unit. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2000;28:427–430
  8. Manecke GR. Edwards FloTrac sensor and Vigileo monitor: Easy, accurate, reliable cardiac output assessment using the arterial pulse wave. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2005;2:523–527
  9. Baulig W, Bernhard EO, Bettex D, et al. Cardiac output measurement by pulse dye densitometry in cardiac surgery. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:968–973
  10. Levett JM, Replogle RL. Thermodilution cardiac output: A critical analysis and review of the literature. J Surg Res. 1979;27:392–404
  11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310
  12. Critchley LA, Critchley JA. A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques. J Clin Monit Comput. 1999;15:85–91
  13. de Waal EE, Kalkman CJ, Rex S, et al. Validation of a new arterial pulse contour-based cardiac output device. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1904–1909
  14. Mayer J, Boldt J, Schollhorn KD, et al. Semi-invasive monitoring of cardiac output by a new device using arterial pressure waveform analysis: A comparison with intermittent pulmonary artery thermodilution in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2007;98:176–182

PII: S1053-0770(07)00366-7

doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2007.11.001

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 22, Issue 3 , Pages 388-393 , June 2008