Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 22, Issue 5 , Pages 713-718, October 2008

Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III Outcome Prediction After Major Vascular Surgery

  • Mark T. Keegan, MB, MRCPI

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Mark T. Keegan, MB, MRCPI, Department of Anesthesiology, Charlton 1145, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905
  • ,
  • Francis X. Whalen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Daniel R. Brown, MD, PhD, FCCM

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Tuhin K. Roy, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • ,
  • Bekele Afessa, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

published online 31 March 2008.

Objective: To investigate the performance of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) III scoring system in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) after major vascular surgery.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Setting: A tertiary referral center.

Participants: Three thousand one hundred forty-eight patients who underwent major vascular surgery between October 1994 and March 2006.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and Main Results: Data were abstracted from an institutional APACHE III database. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) (with 95% confidence intervals) were calculated. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and Hosmer-Lemeshow C statistic were used to assess discrimination and calibration, respectively. The mean age of 3,148 patients studied was 70.5 years (±standard deviation 9.6). The mean Acute Physiology Score and the APACHE III score on the day of ICU admission were 31.0 (±17.5) and 45.1 (±18.8), respectively. The mean predicted ICU and hospital mortality rates were 3.2% (±7.8%) and 5.0% (±9.5%), respectively. The median (and interquartile range) ICU and hospital lengths of stay were 4.3 (3.6-5.1) and 14 days (11.9-16.8 days), respectively. The observed ICU mortality rate was 2.4% (75/3, 148 patients) and hospital mortality rate was 3.7% (116/3,148). The ICU and hospital SMRs were 0.74 (0.58-0.91) and 0.74 (0.61-0.88), respectively. The AUC of APACHE III–derived prediction of hospital mortality was 0.840 (95% confidence interval, 0.799-0.880), indicating excellent discrimination. The Hosmer-Lemeshow C statistic was 28.492, with a p value <0.01, indicating poor calibration.

Conclusions: The APACHE III scoring system discriminates well between survivors and nonsurvivors after major vascular surgery, but calibration of the model is poor.

Key words: vascular surgery, abdominal aortic aneurysm, intensive care unit, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation scoring systems, prognosis

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1053-0770(08)00010-4

doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2008.01.009

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 22, Issue 5 , Pages 713-718, October 2008