Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 22, Issue 5 , Pages 662-669, October 2008

Perioperative Coagulation Management and Blood Conservation in Cardiac Surgery: A Canadian Survey

  • Ravi Taneja, MD, FFARCSI, FRCA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Ravi Taneja MD, FFARCSI, FRCA, Department of Anesthesia & Perioperative Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, 339 Windermere Road, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
  • ,
  • Philip Fernandes, CPC

      Affiliations

    • Clinical Perfusion Services, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Gulshan Marwaha, FCARCSI

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Davy Cheng, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada
  • ,
  • Daniel Bainbridge, FRCPC

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada

published online 12 May 2008.

Objective: To determine which strategies are currently used for (anti)coagulation management and blood conservation during cardiac surgery in Canada.

Design: Institutional survey.

Setting: University hospital.

Participants: All sites performing cardiac surgery in Canada.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and Main Results: The response rate was 85%. Anticoagulation with heparin is monitored routinely through the activated coagulation time (ACT). Less than 10% of centers use heparin concentrations (Hepcon HMS, Medtronic), thromboelastography, or other point-of-care tests perioperatively. Eighty percent of centers routinely use tranexamic acid as the primary antifibrinolytic agent; however aprotinin until recently, was used more commonly for patients at increased risk for bleeding. Retrograde autologous prime is commonly used (62%); however, cell savers are uncommon for routine patients undergoing cardiac surgery (29%). Although most hospitals use a hematocrit of 20% to 21% for transfusing red blood cells, more than 50% of intensive care units do not have written guidelines for the administration of protamine, fresh frozen plasma, platelets, or factor VIIa. At least one third of centers do not audit their transfusion practices regularly.

Conclusions: The majority of Canadian institutions do not use point-of-care tests other than ACT. Most institutions do not have algorithms for management of bleeding following cardiac surgery and at least 30% do not monitor their transfusion practice perioperatively. Cardiac surgery patients in Canada may benefit from a standardized approach to blood conservation in the perioperative period.

Key Words: cardiac surgery, anticoagulation, blood conservation, survey

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by funds from Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.

PII: S1053-0770(08)00035-9

doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2008.02.005

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 22, Issue 5 , Pages 662-669, October 2008