Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 22, Issue 5 , Pages 688-692, October 2008

The Effects of Vasodilation on Cardiac Output Measured by PiCCO

  • Koichi Yamashita, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Koichi Yamashita, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Okohasu, Oko-cho, Nankoku-shi, Kochi, 783-8505, Japan
  • ,
  • Tomoki Nishiyama, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
  • ,
  • Takeshi Yokoyama, DDS, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Japan
  • ,
  • Hidehiro Abe, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Japan
  • ,
  • Masanobu Manabe, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Japan

published online 18 June 2008.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of vasodilation on cardiac output (CO) measured by pulse contour method using PiCCO (Pulsion Medical Systems AG, Munich, Germany) in comparison with CO by the thermodilution method.

Design: A prospective observational study.

Settings: An operating room in a university hospital.

Participants: Twenty patients scheduled for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting.

Interventions: After anesthesia induction with midazolam, fentanyl, and vecuronium, the PiCCO catheter and pulmonary artery catheter were inserted. Before the initiation of surgery, progressively higher infusions of prostaglandin E1 (PGE1) were administered for vasodilation.

Measurements and Main Results: CO was measured before PGE1 (control); at PGE1 0.01, 0.02, and 0.04 μg/kg/min; and 15 minutes after stopping PGE1 infusion. Systemic vascular resistances (SVRs) at PGE1 0.02 and 0.04 μg/kg/min were significantly lower than the control value. The correlation coefficient (R2) at each point, percentage error, and limits of agreement (bias ± 2 standard deviation of bias) were 0.89, 17, −0.21 ± 0.53 before PGE1; 0.72, 27, −0.31 ± 0.93 at 0.01 μg/kg/min; 0.53, 40, −0.62 ± 1.41 at 0.02 μg/kg/min; 0.57, 34, −0.61 ± 1.26 at 0.04 μg/kg/min; and 0.97, 21, −0.14 ± 0.69 L/min 15 minutes after the end of infusion, respectively.

Conclusions: PiCCO may not be an alternative to thermodilution measurement without recalibration when SVR decreases by infusion of PGE1 ≥0.02 μg/kg/min.

Key Words: cardiac output, pulse contour method, thermodilution method, prostaglandin E1, PiCCO

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1053-0770(08)00098-0

doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2008.04.007

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 22, Issue 5 , Pages 688-692, October 2008