Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 324-329, June 2009

A Phase II Multicenter Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study of Ethyl Pyruvate in High-Risk Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery With Cardiopulmonary Bypass

  • Elliott Bennett-Guerrero, MD

      Affiliations

    • Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprints not available. Address correspondence to Elliott Bennett-Guerrero, MD, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University (DUMC Box 3094), Durham, NC 27710
  • ,
  • Madhav Swaminathan, MD

      Affiliations

    • Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Alina M. Grigore, MD

      Affiliations

    • Baylor College of Medicine, Texas Heart Institute, St Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, TX
  • ,
  • Gary W. Roach, MD

      Affiliations

    • Kaiser Permanente, San Francisco, CA
  • ,
  • Laura G. Aberle, BsPH

      Affiliations

    • Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC
  • ,
  • Jeffrey M. Johnston, MD

      Affiliations

    • Critical Therapeutics Inc, Lexington, MA
  • ,
  • Mitchell P. Fink, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA

published online 06 October 2008.

Objective

Ethyl pyruvate (EP) is an investigational drug that has been shown to protect animals in several models of critical illness including myocardial or mesenteric ischemia/reperfusion injury, sepsis, and hemorrhagic shock. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of EP administration to patients undergoing higher-risk cardiac surgery and to obtain preliminary efficacy data for the prevention of single and multisystem organ dysfunction.

Design

Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study.

Setting

Thirteen US hospitals.

Participants

High-risk (Parsonnet risk score >15) patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft and/or cardiac valvular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

Interventions

Subjects were randomized to placebo or EP (7,500 mg administered intravenously starting after the induction of general anesthesia followed by 5 more doses of 7,500 mg administered every 6 hours). The mean body weight (83 kg), corresponding to a dose of 90 mg/kg at each of the 6 dosing intervals, exceeds the dose of 40 mg/kg shown to be effective in many animal models.

Measurements and Main Results

The primary composite endpoint consisted of any of the following occurring within 28 days postoperatively: death, mechanical ventilation >48 hours postoperatively, acute renal injury/failure using the established RIFLE criteria, or need for vasoconstrictors >48 hours postoperatively. One hundred two patients were studied (placebo n = 53 and EP n = 49). No statistically significant differences were observed between groups with regard to clinical parameters or markers of systemic inflammation.

Conclusion

Despite positive results in numerous animal models, the administration of EP does not appear to confer any benefit to cardiac surgical patients undergoing CPB.

Key words: phase II, human, ethyl pyruvate, cardiopulmonary bypass, cardiac surgery

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Sponsored by Critical Therapeutics Inc, Lexington, MA.

PII: S1053-0770(08)00237-1

doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2008.08.005

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 23, Issue 3 , Pages 324-329, June 2009