Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 23, Issue 6 , Pages 775-779, December 2009

The Association Between the Initial End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide Difference and the Lowest Arterial Oxygen Tension Value Obtained During One-Lung Anesthesia With Propofol or Sevoflurane

Presented in brief at the 2007 Annual Meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, San Francisco, CA, October 13, 2007.

  • Naokazu Fukuoka, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
  • ,
  • Hiroki Iida, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Hiroki Iida, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu-City, Gifu 501-1194, Japan
  • ,
  • Shigeru Akamatsu, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
  • ,
  • Kiyoshi Nagase, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
  • ,
  • Hisashi Iwata, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Advanced Surgery, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
  • ,
  • Shuji Dohi, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan

published online 05 June 2009.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to examine the correlation between the lowest PaO2 value recorded during the first 45 minutes of one-lung ventilation (OLV) and the end-tidal CO2 (ETCO2) difference between two-lung ventilation (TLV) and the early phase of OLV.

Design

A prospective, randomized study.

Setting

A university hospital.

Participants

Thirty-six patients scheduled for elective thoracic surgery.

Interventions

Thoracic surgery patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups (group P [n = 18], maintained with propofol; group S [n = 18], maintained with sevoflurane). After setting up, the authors measured arterial blood gases at FIO2 = 1.0 as follows: during TLV and at 5 minutes, 15 minutes, 30 minutes, and 45 minutes after the start of OLV. ETCO2 was recorded just before and at 3 minutes after the start of OLV. The authors examined the relationship between the initial ETCO2 difference and the lowest PaO2 value recorded during the first 45 minutes of OLV.

Measurements and Main Results

There was a significant negative correlation between the lowest PaO2 (x) value and the initial ETCO2 difference (y) during OLV in each group (group P: y = −0.0203x + 7.2571, r2 = 0.5351; group S: y = −0.0257x + 7.3158, r2 = 0.6129). This correlation was not significantly different between the groups.

Conclusion

The present study indicates that the ETCO2 difference between TLV and early OLV has an association with impaired oxygenation later during OLV. This would be a simple and clinically convenient predictor of the lowest PaO2 value likely to be reached during one-lung anesthesia with either propofol or sevoflurane.

Key Words: one-lung ventilation, oxygenation, end-tidal carbon dioxide, propofol, sevoflurane

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported by Grant-in Aid for Scientific Research No. 18591697 (Ministry of Education, Science and Culture, Japan).

PII: S1053-0770(09)00103-7

doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2009.03.023

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 23, Issue 6 , Pages 775-779, December 2009