Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 24, Issue 3 , Pages 408-412, June 2010

In Vitro Comparative Study of Hemostatic Components in Warfarin-Treated and Fibrinogen-Deficient Plasma

Presented in part at the annual meeting of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, Orlando, FL, October 21, 2008, and at the annual meeting of the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, San Antonio, TX, April 21, 2009.

  • Brady Rumph, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • Daniel Bolliger, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • Nikhil Narang, BS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • Ross J. Molinaro, PhD, MT

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • Jerrold H. Levy, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • Fania Szlam, MMSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
  • ,
  • Kenichi A. Tanaka, MD, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress reprint requests to Kenichi A. Tanaka, MD, MSc, Department of Anesthesiology, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322

published online 12 October 2009.

Objective

The authors hypothesized that various hemostatic products may differently affect viscoelastic clot formation depending on their respective procoagulant activity and fibrinogen content.

Design

In vitro coagulopathy modeling using warfarin-treated plasma (international normalized ratio, 2.8-3.8) and fibrinogen-deficient plasma evaluated by rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM; Pentapharm, Munich, Germany).

Setting

A university laboratory.

Intervention

Different volumes of cryoprecipitate, fresh frozen plasma (FFP), fibrinogen concentrate, and platelet concentrate were mixed with each abnormal plasma to simulate the in vivo transfusions of 250 mL to 1,000 mL. Three thromboelastometric variables that reflect the rate and extent of clot growth were measured: (1) coagulation time (CT), (2) angle, and (3) maximal clot firmness (MCF).

Measurements and Main Results

In warfarin-treated plasma, the addition of FFP, cryoprecipitate, and platelets led to a dose-dependent improvement of CT and angle, whereas MCF increased with cryoprecipitate or platelets only. The addition of fibrinogen concentrate improved MCF and angle but not CT. In fibrinogen-deficient plasma, the addition of cryoprecipitate, platelets, and fibrinogen concentrate led to a dose-dependent improvement of ROTEM variables, whereas the addition of FFP resulted in significantly longer CT and lower MCF values compared with other hemostatic products. The addition of platelets in the presence of cytochalasin D (a platelet inhibitor) resulted in improvements of ROTEM variables that were similar to when FFP was added to warfarin-treated and fibrinogen-deficient plasma.

Conclusions

Cryoprecipitate supports clot formation on ROTEM more efficiently than FFP because of the high fibrinogen content. Improved ROTEM variables after platelet addition are presumably caused by increased interaction among thrombin-activated platelets and fibrinogen.

Key Words: thromboelastometry, fresh frozen plasma, cryoprecipitate, fibrinogen

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Supported in part by FAER (N.N.).

PII: S1053-0770(09)00290-0

doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2009.07.012

Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Volume 24, Issue 3 , Pages 408-412, June 2010