Original Article| Volume 30, ISSUE 2, P352-362, April 2016

Point-of-Care Hemoglobin/Hematocrit Testing: Comparison of Methodology and Technology


      Point-of-care (POC) testing allows rapid assessment of hemoglobin (Hgb) and hematocrit (Hct) values. This study compared 3 POC testing devices—the Radical-7 pulse oximeter (Radical-7, Neuchȃtel, Switzerland), the i-STAT (Abbott Point of Care, Princeton, NJ), and the GEM 4000 (Instrumentation Laboratory, Bedford, MA)—to the hospital reference device, the UniCel DxH 800 (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA) in cardiac surgery patients.


      Prospective study.


      Tertiary care cardiovascular center.


      Twenty-four consecutive elective adult cardiac surgery patients.


      Hgb and Hct values were measured using 3 POC devices (the Radical-7, i-STAT, and GEM 4000) and a reference laboratory device (UniCel DxH 800). Data were collected simultaneously before surgery, after heparin administration, after heparin reversal with protamine, and after sternal closure. Data were analyzed using bias analyses. POC testing data were compared with that of the reference laboratory device.

      Measurements and Main Results

      Hgb levels ranged from 6.8 to 15.1 g/dL, and Hct levels ranged from 20.1% to 43.8%. The overall mean bias was lowest with the i-STAT (Hct, 0.22%; Hgb 0.05 g/dL) compared with the GEM 4000 (Hct, 2.15%; Hgb, 0.63 g/dL) and the Radical-7 (Hgb 1.16 g/dL). The range of data for the i-STAT and Radical-7 was larger than that with the GEM 4000, and the pattern or slopes changed significantly with the i-STAT and Radical-7, whereas that of the GEM 4000 remained relatively stable. The GEM 4000 demonstrated a consistent overestimation of laboratory data, which tended to improve after bypass and at lower Hct/Hgb levels. The i-STAT bias changed from overestimation to underestimation, the latter in the post-cardiopulmonary bypass period and at lower Hct/Hgb levels. By contrast, the Radical-7 biases increased during the surgical procedure and in the lower ranges of Hgb.


      Important clinical differences and limitations were found among the 3 POC testing devices that should caution clinicians from relying on these data as sole determinants of when or when not to perform transfusion in patients. Even though a low bias might support the use of POC data, further analysis of the bias plots demonstrates pattern changes during the surgical procedure and across the range of Hct/Hgb data.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Adjuvant Therapies
        Practice guidelines for perioperative blood transfusion and adjuvant therapies: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Perioperative Blood Transfusion and Adjuvant Therapies.
        Anesthesiology. 2006; 105: 198-208
        • McMahon D.J.
        • Carpenter R.L.
        Comparison of conductivity based hematocrit determinations with conventional laboratory methods in autologous blood transfusions.
        Anesth Analg. 1990; 71: 541-544
        • Gotch F.
        • Torres L.
        • Evans M.
        • et al.
        Comparison of conductivity measured hematocrit to microhematocrit.
        ASAIO Trans. 1991; 37: m138-m139
        • Stott R.A.
        • Hortin G.L.
        • Wilhite T.R.
        • et al.
        Analytical artifacts in hematocrit measurements by whole blood chemistry analyzers.
        Clin Chem. 1995; 41: 306-311
        • McNulty S.E.
        • Torjman M.
        • Wlodzimierz G.
        • et al.
        A comparison of four bedside methods of hemoglobin assessment during cardiac surgery.
        Anesth Analg. 1995; 81: 1197-1202
        • Myers G.J.
        • Browne J.
        Point of care hematocrit and hemoglobin in cardiac surgery: A review.
        Perfusion. 2007; 22: 179-183
        • Hopfer S.M.
        • Nadeau F.L.
        • Sundra M.
        • et al.
        Effect of protein on hemoglobin and hematocrit assays with a conductivity-based point-of-care testing device: Comparison with optical methods.
        Ann Clin Lab Sci. 2004; 34: 75-82
        • Steinfelder-Visscher J.
        • Weerwind P.W.
        • Teerenstra S.
        • et al.
        Reliability of POC hematocrit, blood gas, electrolyte, lactate and glucose measurement during cardiopulmonary bypass.
        Perfusion. 2006; 21: 33-37
        • Shapiro B.A.
        • Peruzzi W.T.
        • Kozelowski-Templin R.
        Clinical Application of Blood Gases.
        ed 5. Mosby, St Louis, MO1994: 334-336
        • Prichard J.S.
        • French J.S.
        • Alvar N.
        Clinical evaluation of the ABL-77 for point of care analysis in the cardiovascular operating room.
        JECT. 2006; 38: 128-133
        • Vlah S.H.
        • Dvornik S.
        • Grdovic D.
        Analytical performance of the Gem Premier 4000 - a comparison study.
        Biochemia Medica. 2009; 19: 192-198
        • Carabini L.M.
        • Navarre W.J.
        • Ault J.L.
        • et al.
        A comparison of hemoglobin measured by co-oximetry and central laboratory during major spine fusion surgery.
        Anesth Analg. 2015; 120: 60-65
        • Nguyen B.-V.
        • Vincent J.-L.
        • Nowak E.
        • et al.
        The accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin measurement by multiwavelength pulse oximetry after cardiac surgery.
        Anesth Analg. 2011; 113: 1052-1057
        • Sjostrand F.
        • Rodhe P.
        • Berglund E.
        • et al.
        The use of a noninvasive hemoglobin monitor for volume kinetic analysis in an emergency room setting.
        Anesth Analg. 2013; 116: 337-342
        • Miller R.D.
        • Ward T.A.
        • Shiboski S.C.
        • et al.
        A comparison of three methods of hemoglobin monitoring in patients undergoing spine surgery.
        Anesth Analg. 2011; 112: 858-863
        • Applegate II, R.L.
        • Barr S.J.
        • Collier C.E.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of pulse cooximetry in patients undergoing abdominal pelvic surgery.
        Anesthesiology. 2012; 116: 65-72
        • Voss M.M.
        • Kalmar A.F.
        • MMRF Struys
        • et al.
        Accuracy of non-invasive measurement of hemoglobin concentration by pulse co-oximetry during steady-state and dynamic conditions in liver surgery.
        Br J Anaesth. 2012; 109: 522-528
        • Park Y.-H.
        • Lee J.-H.
        • Song J.-G.
        • et al.
        The accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring using the Radical-7 Pulse Co-Oximeter in children undergoing neurosurgery.
        Anesth Analg. 2012; 115: 1302-1307
        • Causey M.W.
        • Miller S.
        • Foster A.
        • et al.
        Validation of noninvasive hemoglobin measurements using the Masimo Radical-7 SpHgb Station.
        Am J Surg. 2011; 201: 592-598
        • Tsuei B.J.
        • Hanseman D.J.
        • Blakeman M.J.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring in patients at risk for hemorrhage.
        J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2014; 77: S134-S139
        • Patino M.
        • Schultz L.
        • Hossain M.
        • et al.
        Trending and accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring in pediatric perioperative patients.
        Anesth Analg. 2014; 119: 920-925
        • Macknet M.R.
        • Allard M.
        • Applegate II, R.L.
        • et al.
        The accuracy of noninvasive and continuous total hemoglobin measurement by pulse co-oximetry in human subjects undergoing hemodilution.
        Anesth Analg. 2010; 111: 1424-1426
        • Berkow L.
        • Rotolo S.
        • Mirski E.
        Continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring during complex spine surgery.
        Anesth Analg. 2011; 113: 1396-1402
        • Lamhaut L.
        Comparison between a new noninvasive continuous technology of spectrophtometry-based and RBC count for hemoglobin monitoring during surgery with hemorrhagic risk.
        Eur J Anaesth. 2010; 27: 60-61
        • Lamhaut L.
        • Apriotesei R.
        • Combes X.
        • et al.
        Comparison of the accuracy of noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring by Spectrophotomety (SpHgb) and HemoCue with automated laboratory hemoglobin measurement.
        Anesthesiology. 2011; 115: 548-554
        • Kim S.-H.
        • Lilot M.
        • Murphy L.S.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of continuous noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
        Anesth Analg. 2014; 119: 332-346
        • Morey T.E.
        • Gravenstein N.
        • Rice M.J.
        Assessing point-of-care hemoglobin measurement: Be careful we don’t bias with bias.
        Anesth Analg. 2011; 113: 1289-1291
        • Rice M.J.
        • Gravenstein N.
        • Morey T.E.
        Noninvasive hemoglobin monitoring: How accurate is enough?.
        Anesth Analg. 2013; 117: 902-907