Introduction
There are high incidence of pulmonary complications and acute respiratory failure
(3,2—28,6%)¹ after cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. The study aimed to
evaluate the effectiveness of various tactics of respiratory support during cardiopulmonary
bypass (CPB) for the prevention of postoperative pulmonary complications.
Methods
This is a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study in parallel groups. The
study was approved by a local ethics committee. Informed consent was obligatory for
all participants. Sixty patients were divided into two groups. In group 1 we provided
a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) of +5 cm H2O during CPB. In group 2 patients
underwent mechanical ventilation with reduced volume (volume control (VC) mode, tidal
volume 3 ml / kg of ideal body weight) and respiratory rate of 6 breathes per minute
with positive end-expiratory pressure + 5 cm H2O. The primary end-point of the study
was the value of the partial pressure of oxygen in arterial blood to oxygen fraction
in inhaled gas mixture ratio (paO2/FiO2) at different stages of perioperative management:
T1 (after the beginning of mechanical ventilation, T2 (before the CPB), T3 (after
CPB), T4 (at the end of the surgery), T5 (upon admission to the ICU), T6 and T7 (6
and 12 hours after surgery, respectively). Secondary end-points were the common lung
complications rate (pneumonia, pleural effusion, atelectasis, pneumothorax), the frequency
of recruitment maneuvers during the mechanical ventilation, the need for non-invasive
ventilation after extubation, the frequency of re-intubation of the trachea. Statistical
analysis was carried out in SPSS for Mac v19 (IBM, Inc, USA). Data were presented
as mean (±standard deviation) or number (percent). A comparison of the quantitative
characteristics was performed using the Mann Whitney U-test. Fisher's exact test was
used for the incidence of complications between groups. A p value of less than 0.05
was considered statistically significant.
Results
The results are presented in Tables 1 and 2.

The paO2/FiO2 in the VC group was higher than in the CPAP group at stages T3 and T5.
The frequency of recruiting maneuvers in the VC group was lower than in the CPAP group.
There was a lower incidence of atelectasis in the VC group than in the CPAP group
(Table 2).
The low-volume lung ventilation during the CPB is beneficial for oxygenating function
of the lungs in comparison with CPAP respiratory support.
Discussion
The low-volume lung ventilation during the CPB is beneficial for oxygenating function
of the lungs in comparison with CPAP respiratory support.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular AnesthesiaAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
Article info
Identification
Copyright
© 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc.