Thoracic Panel Session : New Challenges For 2021 – October 28, 2021 CO:15| Volume 35, SUPPLEMENT 1, S13-S14, October 2021



      The competency of using video laryngoscopes (VL) for double-lumen tube (DLT) endobronchial intubations can be improved with constant training as assessed by measuring the learning curves. We hypothesized that the time to DLT intubation would be reduced over the intubation attempts.


      Forty-two novice medical students unfamiliar with DLT intubation were randomly allocated to two sequences, including DLT intubation using King Vision and McGrath VLs, in a randomized crossover manikin study. Each participant completed 100 DLT intubation attempts on both simulated airways using the study devices (25 attempts for each). The primary outcome was the time to DLT intubation. The secondary outcomes included the best glottic view, optimizing maneuvers, and intubation first-pass success. The learning curve for each participant was measured using the Cumulative Sum (CUSUM) analysis. [1,2]


      The use of King Vision VL was associated with significantly shorter time to DLT intubation (p <0.044 and p<0.05, respectively) and a higher percentage of glottic opening (POGO) compared to the McGrath VL (p <0.011 and p<0.002, respectively) in the simulated ‘easy’ and ‘difficult’ over most of the intubation attempts. In the simulated ‘easy’ airway, the first-pass success ratio was higher when using the King Vision® VL (median [Minimum-Maximum] 100% [100% - 100%] and 100% [88% - 100%], p = 0.012). The results of the CUSUM analysis are shown in Figure 1.
      Figure 1. The CUSUM analysis charts for the 25 intubation attempts using the King Vision® and McGrath® in the simulated ‘easy’ and ‘difficult’ airway models. Lines CUSUM for P1 to CUSUM for P42 represent the learning curves of individual students. Orange and blue Lines h1 and h0 represent upper and lower control limits of 2.24 and -2.24, respectively. Y-axis values represent multiples of h1 and h0. P1….P42: Participant 1….Participant 42. If the learning curve crosses H0 from above, it means that the measured percentage failure does not differ from the acceptable failure rate with a type 1 error equal to œ and a type 2 error equal to ß). When the student crosses the H0 boundary, it is considered that the proficiency level has been achieved for the procedure assessed. [1,2]


      Novice medical students developing skills over intubation attempts translated into faster DLT intubation and higher success rate on simulated ‘easy’ and ‘difficult’ airways. A median of 9 DLT intubations is required to achieve a 92.2% or greater DLT intubation success degree.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect