Advertisement

Intraoperative Noninvasive Left Ventricular Myocardial Work Indices in Patients Undergoing On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Published:October 29, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2022.10.025

      Objectives

      Noninvasive echocardiographic analysis of left ventricular (LV) myocardial work (MW) enables insights into cardiac mechanics, contractility, and efficacy beyond ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). However, there are limited perioperative data on patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The authors aimed to describe the feasibility and the intraoperative course of this novel assessment tool of ventricular function in these patients, and compare it to conventional 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) echocardiographic parameters and strain analysis.

      Design

      A prospective observational study.

      Setting

      At a single university hospital.

      Participants

      Twenty-five patients with preoperative preserved LV and right ventricular function, sinus rhythm, without significant heart valve disease or pulmonary hypertension, and an uncomplicated intraoperative course scheduled for isolated on-pump CABG surgery.

      Interventions

      Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed intraoperatively after the induction of anesthesia (T1), after termination of cardiopulmonary bypass (T2), and after sternal closure (T3). All measurements were performed under stable hemodynamic conditions, in sinus rhythm or atrial pacing, and vasopressor support with norepinephrine ≤ 0.1 µg/kg/min.

      Measurements and Main Results

      The EchoPAC v204 software (GE Vingmed Ultrasound AS, Norway) was used for analysis of 2D and 3D LVEF, LV GLS, LV global work index (GWI), LV global constructive work (GCW), LV global wasted work (GWW), and LV global work efficiency (GWE). The MW analysis was feasible in all patients. Although there was no significant difference in the values of 2D and 3D EF during the intraoperative interval, GLS deteriorated significantly after CABG compared to assessment after induction of anesthesia (T1 v T2, -13.3 ± 3.0% v -11.6 ± 3.1%; p = 0.012). The GWI declined significantly after surgery (T1 v T2, 1,224 ± 312 mmHg% v 940 ± 267 mmHg%; p < 0.001), as well as GCW (T1 v T2, 1,460 ± 312 mmHg% v 1,244 ± 336 mmHg%; p = 0.005). The GWW increased after CABG (T1 v T2, 143 mmHg% (IQR 99-183) v 251 mmHg% (IQR 179-361); p < 0.001), and GWE decreased (T1 v T2, 89% (IQR 85-92) v 80% (IQR 75-87); p < 0.001). There were no significant changes in the values of 2D and 3D EF, GLS, GWI, GCW, GWW, and GWE before and after sternal closure (T2 v T3).

      Conclusion

      The intraoperative analysis of noninvasive echocardiographically-assessed LV MW indices is feasible. In the short-term period after uncomplicated on-pump CABG, GLS, as well as global and constructive MW, decreased, whereas wasted work increased, resulting in a less efficient left ventricle. None of these aspects was detected by conventional echocardiographic parameters. Therefore, strain and MW analysis might be more sensitive parameters in detecting myocardial dysfunction by TEE in the perioperative setting, adding information on perioperative cardiac energetics.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Nicoara A
        • Skubas N
        • Ad N
        • et al.
        Guidelines for the use of transesophageal echocardiography to assist with surgical decision-making in the operating room: A surgery-based approach: From the American Society of Echocardiography in collaboration with the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists and the Society of Thoracic Surgeons.
        J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020; 33: 692-734
        • Thaden JJ
        • Malouf JF
        • Rehfeldt KH
        • et al.
        Adult intraoperative echocardiography: A comprehensive review of current practice.
        J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2020; 33 (e11): 735-755
        • Lang RM
        • Badano LP
        • Mor-Avi V
        • et al.
        Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: An update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging.
        Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 16: 233-270
        • Buckberg G
        • Hoffman JI
        • Mahajan A
        • et al.
        Cardiac mechanics revisited: The relationship of cardiac architecture to ventricular function.
        Circulation. 2008; 118: 2571-2587
        • Buckberg G
        • Hoffman JI
        • Nanda NC
        • et al.
        Ventricular torsion and untwisting: Further insights into mechanics and timing interdependence: A viewpoint.
        Echocardiography. 2011; 28: 782-804
        • Sengupta PP
        • Krishnamoorthy VK
        • Korinek J
        • et al.
        Left ventricular form and function revisited: Applied translational science to cardiovascular ultrasound imaging.
        J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2007; 20: 539-551
        • Gudmundsson P
        • Rydberg E
        • Winter R
        • et al.
        Visually estimated left ventricular ejection fraction by echocardiography is closely correlated with formal quantitative methods.
        Int J Cardiol. 2005; 101: 209-212
        • Stokke TM
        • Hasselberg NE
        • Smedsrud MK
        • et al.
        Geometry as a confounder when assessing ventricular systolic function: Comparison between ejection fraction and strain.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017; 70: 942-954
        • Konstam MA
        • Abboud FM.
        Ejection fraction: Misunderstood and overrated (changing the paradigm in categorizing heart failure).
        Circulation. 2017; 135: 717-719
        • Solomon SD
        • Anavekar N
        • Skali H
        • et al.
        Influence of ejection fraction on cardiovascular outcomes in a broad spectrum of heart failure patients.
        Circulation. 2005; 112: 3738-3744
        • Benson MJ
        • Silverton N
        • Morrissey C
        • et al.
        Strain imaging: An everyday tool for the perioperative echocardiographer.
        J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2020; 34: 2707-2717
        • Mor-Avi V
        • Lang RM
        • Badano LP
        • et al.
        Current and evolving echocardiographic techniques for the quantitative evaluation of cardiac mechanics: ASE/EAE consensus statement on methodology and indications endorsed by the Japanese Society of Echocardiography.
        J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2011; 24: 277-313
        • Russell K
        • Eriksen M
        • Aaberge L
        • et al.
        A novel clinical method for quantification of regional left ventricular pressure-strain loop area: A non-invasive index of myocardial work.
        Eur Heart J. 2012; 33: 724-733
        • Smiseth OA
        • Donal E
        • Penicka M
        • et al.
        How to measure left ventricular myocardial work by pressure-strain loops.
        Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021; 22: 259-261
        • Russell K
        • Eriksen M
        • Aaberge L
        • et al.
        Assessment of wasted myocardial work: A novel method to quantify energy loss due to uncoordinated left ventricular contractions.
        Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013; 305: H996-1003
        • Borde D
        • Joshi P
        • Asegaonkar B
        • et al.
        Perioperative changes in global myocardial work indices in a patient with severe aortic stenosis with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement.
        J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022; 36: 2060-2065
        • Spetsotaki K
        • Zayat R
        • Donuru S
        • et al.
        Evaluation of left ventricular myocardial work performance in patients undergoing on-pump and off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
        Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020; 26: 276-285
        • Kass DA
        • Midei MM
        • Graves W
        • et al.
        Use of a conductance (volume) catheter and transient inferior vena caval occlusion for rapid determination of pressure-volume relationships in man.
        Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1998; 15: 192-202
        • Kass DA
        • Yamazaki T
        • Burkhoff D
        • et al.
        Determination of left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationships by the conductance (volume) catheter technique.
        Circulation. 1986; 73: 586-595
        • Abawi D
        • Rinaldi T
        • Faragli A
        • et al.
        The non-invasive assessment of myocardial work by pressure-strain analysis: Clinical applications.
        Heart Fail Rev. 2022; 27: 1261-1279
        • Ilardi F
        • D'Andrea A
        • D'Ascenzi F
        • et al.
        Myocardial work by echocardiography: Principles and applications in clinical practice.
        J Clin Med. 2021; 10: 4521
        • Roemer S
        • Jaglan A
        • Santos D
        • et al.
        The utility of myocardial work in clinical practice.
        J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2021; 34: 807-818
        • Hahn RT
        • Abraham T
        • Adams MS
        • et al.
        Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: Recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists.
        J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013; 26: 921-964
        • Voigt J-U
        • Pedrizzetti G
        • Lysyansky P
        • et al.
        Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: Consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging.
        Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014; 16: 1-11
        • Lang RM
        • Badano LP
        • Tsang W
        • et al.
        EAE/ASE recommendations for image acquisition and display using three-dimensional echocardiography.
        Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012; 13: 1-46
        • Kasprzak JD
        • Sadeghpour A
        • Jurcut R
        • et al.
        Doppler echocardiography.
        in: Lancellotti P Zamorano JL Habib G The EACVI Textbook of Echocardiography. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom2016: 27-34
        • Fortuni F
        • Butcher SC
        • van der Kley F
        • et al.
        Left ventricular myocardial work in patients with severe aortic stenosis.
        J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2021; 34: 257-266
        • Jain R
        • Bajwa T
        • Roemer S
        • et al.
        Myocardial work assessment in severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
        Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021; 22: 715-721
        • Papadopoulos K
        • Ikonomidis I
        • Chrissoheris M
        • et al.
        MitraClip and left ventricular reverse remodelling: Aa strain imaging study.
        ESC Heart Fail. 2020; 7: 1409-1418
        • Edwards NFA
        • Scalia GM
        • Shiino K
        • et al.
        Global myocardial work is superior to global longitudinal strain to predict significant coronary artery disease in patients with normal left ventricular function and wall motion.
        J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019; 32: 947-957
        • Chan J
        • Edwards NFA
        • Khandheria BK
        • et al.
        A new approach to assess myocardial work by non-invasive left ventricular pressure-strain relations in hypertension and dilated cardiomyopathy.
        Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019; 20: 31-39
        • Lustosa RP
        • Butcher SC
        • van der Bijl P
        • et al.
        Global left ventricular myocardial work efficiency and long-term prognosis in patients after st-segment-elevation myocardial infarction.
        Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2021; 14e012072
        • Manganaro R
        • Marchetta S
        • Dulgheru R
        • et al.
        Echocardiographic reference ranges for normal non-invasive myocardial work indices: Results from the EACVI NORRE study.
        Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imagin. 2019; 20: 582-590
        • Truong VT
        • Vo HQ
        • Ngo TNM
        • et al.
        Normal ranges of global left ventricular myocardial work indices in adults: A meta-analysis.
        J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2022; 35 (e8): 369-377
        • Papadopoulos K
        • Ozden Tok O
        • Mitrousi K
        • et al.
        Myocardial work: Methodology and clinical applications.
        Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11: 573
        • Bigeon JY
        • Rouge J
        • Berthezene R
        • et al.
        Perioperative LV strain (avgGLS) alteration and long-term incidence of MACE in cardiac surgery.
        J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2018; 32: S17-S18
        • Leclercq C
        • Rouge J
        • Burtin P
        • et al.
        Left ventricular strain variations in cardiac surgery; The role of the type of surgery.
        J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019; 33: S130
        • Rouge J
        • Burtin P
        • Leclercq C
        • et al.
        Perioperative LV strain (AVGGLS) alteration and predictive value for long term occurence of MACE.
        J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2019; 33: S131-S132
        • Labus J
        • Winata J
        • Schmidt T
        • et al.
        Perioperative two-dimensional left ventricular global longitudinal strain in coronary artery bypass surgery: A prospective observational pilot study.
        J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2022; 36: 166-174
        • Chen W
        • Ortiz-Leon XA
        • Posada-Martinez EL
        • et al.
        Acute changes of left ventricular function during surgical revascularization by 3D speckle tracking.
        Echocardiography. 2021; 38: 623-631